MFEP-Based Evaluation of Public Information Governance with Socio-Technical and Data Lifecycle Perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33005/itij.v3i1.52Keywords:
Multi-Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP), Data Lifecycle Management (DLM), Socio-Technical Systems (STS), Public Information Governance, Information Systems ManagementAbstract
In the era of public information disclosure, public information management is essential for transparency, accountability, and citizen participation. This study assesses eight Public Information Management Officers (PPID) in Central Java, Indonesia, utilizing 21 variables measured by a Multi-Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP) based on Data Lifecycle Management (DLM) and Socio-Technical Systems (STS).
Data was collected using Likert-scale questionnaires, and performance was assessed using Evaluation Weight Value (EWV) and Total Evaluation Weight (TEW).
The results suggest that technology-related indicators outperformed human competency and regulatory compliance. "Use" and "Disposal" were the DLM phases with the worst performance, demonstrating deficiencies in data accountability and infrastructure. In STS, the "People" dimension lagged, emphasizing the need for capacity building. The findings indicate that, while digital infrastructure is robust, governance and human resource development require strengthening. Strategic improvements in underperforming sectors are suggested to strengthen public information governance.
Downloads
References
[1] R. Retnowati, D. Manongga, and H. Sunarto, “Development of sustainability systems for open government data (OGD) management by combining the shel model and soft systems methodology analysis,” J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 97, no. 12, 2019.
[2] H. Jiang, Q. Shao, J. J. H. Liou, T. Shao, and X. Shi, “Improving the sustainability of open government data,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1–26, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11082388.
[3] Prasetyo A, Darmawan M, and Moelyana R, “Analisis dan Perancangan Tata Kelola Data Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik Domain Data Quality Management pada Dama DMBOK V2 (Studi Kasus : Diskominfotik KBB) Analysis and Design of Data Governance System Based on Electronic Domain Quality Data Man,” E-Proceeding Eng., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 7775–7786, 2019.
[4] Felix C Aguboshim, Ifeyinwa N Obiokafor, and Anastasia O Emenike, “Sustainable data governance in the era of global data security challenges in Nigeria: A narrative review,” World J. Adv. Res. Rev., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 378–385, 2023, doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2023.17.2.0154.
[5] R. Gracilla, F. Vigonte, and M. V. Abante, “Evaluating Public Information Systems: Enhancing Transparency, Efficiency, and Citizen Engagement in Digital Governance,” SSRN Electron. J., 2025, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5268520.
[6] S. I. H. Shah, V. Peristeras, and I. Magnisalis, DaLiF: a data lifecycle framework for data-driven governments, vol. 8, no. 1. Springer International Publishing, 2021.
[7] R. Retnowati et al., “Pengaruh Pemanfaatan Situs PPIP,” in SINTAK, 2019, pp. 289–297.
[8] R. Retnowati, H. Listiyono, P. Purwatiningtyas, A. S. Wedaningsih, and L. Rahmaziana, “Analisis Readiness Penerapan Keterbukaan Informasi Publik (Kip) Dengan Pendekatan Soft Systems Methodology (Ssm),” Dinamik, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 41–56, 2019, doi: 10.35315/dinamik.v24i1.7838.
[9] N. Rees, K. Holding, and M. Sujan, “Information governance as a socio-technical process in the development of trustworthy healthcare AI,” Front. Comput. Sci., vol. 5, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2023.1134818.
[10] A. Yulfitri and Y. F. Achmad, “Analisis Aktivitas Data Governance Pranata Komputer Berdasarkan DAMA-DMBOK 2,” J. Rekayasa Sist. Ind., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 50, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://jrsi.sie.telkomuniversity.ac.id/JRSI/article/view/393.
[11] DAMA International, DAMA-DMBOK: Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition), vol. 44, no. 8. 2017.
[12] W. A. Ramadhani, N. Irawati, and C. Maulana, “Penerapan Metode Multifactor Evaluation Process (MFEP) Untuk Menentukan Kelayakan Penerima Bantuan Pinjaman Modal Usaha Kecil Menengah,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 50–59, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i1.1490.
[13] R. Retnowati, H. R. Putranti, and D. Danang, “Level Of Work Engagement Of Workers Based On Gamification Of Work Using Multi-Factor Evaluation Process ( Mfep ) Method,” J. Posit. Sch. Psychol., vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 6070–6084, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/10886/7028.
[14] L. Tarifu, M. A. Equatora, Romindo, D. Abdullah, Herianto, and Y. M. Saragih, “Decision Support System Simulation Application with MFEP Method,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1845, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1845/1/012027.
[15] R. Retnowati, E. N. Wahyudi, and Y. Anis, “Mengukur E-Participation Masyarakat di Era Transformasi Digital dengan Metode Multi Factor Evaluation Process ( MFEP ),” vol. 8, no. 2, 2022.
[16] Retnowati, S. N. Anwar, and Purwatiningtyas, “Public Information Management Sustainability Priority Model With A Socio-Technical Approach and Analytic Network Process ( ANP ) Methods ( Case Study of Salatiga City PPID ),” Budapest Int. Res. Critics Institute-Journal, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 14011–14026, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://www.bircu-journal.com/index.php/birci/article/view/3505.
[17] F. W. Geels, “ScienceDirect Socio-technical transitions to sustainability : a review of criticisms and elaborations of the Multi-Level Perspective,” Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009.
[18] J. H. Kim and S. J. Eom, “The managerial dimension of open data success: Focusing on the open data initiatives in Korean local governments,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 23, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11236758.
[19] M. Gebler, M. Juraschek, S. Thiede, F. Cerdas, and C. Herrmann, “Defining the ‘Positive Impact’ of socio-technical systems for absolute sustainability: a literature review based on the identification of system design principles and management functions,” Sustain. Sci., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 2597–2613, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11625-022-01168-1.
[20] J. Heiberg, B. Truffer, and C. Binz, “Assessing transitions through socio-technical configuration analysis – a methodological framework and a case study in the water sector,” Res. Policy, vol. 51, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104363.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Retnowati Retnowati, Eko Nur Wahyudi, Purwatiningtyas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Starting with Volume 3, Issue 1 (2025), all articles published in ITIJ will be licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. This new license replaces our previous Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license.
